Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 106
03/15/2011 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB1 | |
HCR5 | |
HB78 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+= | HB 1 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 78 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HCR 5 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HCR 5-VITAMIN D SUPPLEMENTS 3:20:22 PM CHAIR KELLER brought the committee back to order. CHAIR KELLER announced that the next order of business would be HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 5, Relating to prevention of disease and to vitamin D. [In front of the committee was Version 27-LS0504\M.] 3:20:29 PM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON moved to adopt the proposed committee substitute (CS) for HCR 5, Version 27-LS0504\B, Mischel, 3/14/11, as the working document. There being no objection, Version B was before the committee. 3:20:43 PM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON explained that Version B included the addition of "potentially" and the substitution of "promote" for "provide" on page 5, line 26, and on page 6, lines 5, 10, and 16. He pointed to page 6, line 12-13, and noted the addition of "using the comparative treatment effectiveness analysis." He directed attention to the addition of "postmenopausal" on page 2, line 1, the addition of "blood" on page 6, line 5, and the correction to 1,200 IU on page 3, line 28. He reported the addition of a new "Whereas" on page 5, lines 28-29. He expressed his desire that these changes would eliminate any misconception that HCR 5 was a mandate. 3:24:05 PM DR. WARD HURLBURT, Chief Medical Officer/Director, Division Of Public Health, Central Office, Department of Health and Social Services, in response to Chair Keller, confirmed that he had read Version B. He allowed that he still had some concerns with the bill as a clinical statement, and he suggested more general language. He pointed to page 6, lines 11 and [12], which encouraged appropriate vitamin supplements, but he endorsed the dosage recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice, and the American Academy of Pediatrics for related immunizations. He observed that it was not in the State of Alaska's capacity to analyze and make different recommendations. He questioned the recommendation of Vitamin D for pregnant women as being too narrow, and he assured that prenatal vitamins for pregnant women were being promoted. He opined that proposed HCR 5 was still too clinical, and he suggested that the bill be more general. 3:27:44 PM CHAIR KELLER asked if a proposal to promote vitamin supplements including Vitamin D would sufficiently broaden proposed HCR 5. DR. HURLBURT replied that although this would still make a specific recommendation, he did not see it as unreasonable. 3:28:52 PM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON stated that he did not have data to support other supplements, but that he had clinical data and studies to show that many problems in pregnancy were "at greater risk if you are low in Vitamin D." He reflected on the vitamin fads not based on studies, and he indicated his lack of support for the use of supplements that were not backed up by studies. He emphasized that there was a lot of information which showed Alaskans to be deficient in Vitamin D, and that there were greater health risks associated with low Vitamin D. He urged the Department of Health and Social Services to investigate whether a lack of Vitamin D was detrimental to Alaskans specifically. He stated that softening the resolution to say "that the department should look after the health of the Alaskan population" would not urge a specific investigation on the evidence presented in the resolution. He expressed concern with basing studies on the overall population of the United States and not specifically on the Alaskan population. He declared the need for a prevention model for health care. 3:33:10 PM CHAIR KELLER agreed that the purpose of a resolution was to raise awareness in both the general populace and in the Department of Health and Social Services. He expressed his concern that over focus did not allow for other possibilities. 3:33:57 PM REPRESENTATIVE HERRON asked why Vitamin D3 was not referenced in proposed HCR 5. 3:35:01 PM REPRESENTATIVE SEATON, in response to Representative Herron, said that the level of Vitamin D in the blood was the significant factor. He confirmed that both Vitamin D2 and D3 increased the blood serum level, 25(OH)D. He affirmed that HCR 5 was attempting to avoid any specific reference to either Vitamin D2 or D3. 3:36:17 PM REPRESENTATIVE MILLER, noting that the language in proposed HCR 5 promoted Vitamin D supplements, asked if other sources of Vitamin D should also be included. He opined that the combination of Vitamin A with Vitamin D was better for an individual. 3:37:22 PM CAROL BAGGERLY, Director, Grassroots Health, affirmed that Grassroots Health was a public health outreach organization specifically focused on solving the Vitamin D deficiency epidemic. She reported that the optimal dosage of Vitamin D was not available from foods. She stated that the average person used about 4000 IU of Vitamin D each day, but that even a serving of Alaska salmon, the most substantial food source for Vitamin D, only accounted for 400 IU. She declared the best source of Vitamin D to be the sun; however, as most people were not getting enough sun, it was necessary to complement it with food and Vitamin D supplements. 3:38:48 PM REPRESENTATIVE DICK moved to report CSHCR 5, Version 27- LS0504\B, Mischel, 3/14/11, out of committee with individual recommendations. There being no objection, CSHCR 5(HSS) was reported from the House Health and Social Services Standing Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|---|---|
CS HCR 5.pdf |
HHSS 3/15/2011 3:00:00 PM |